Skip to Content
  • January 2022

    1. Aas v. Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal. 4th 627 – economic loss rule
    2. Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand Oaks ( (2002) 27 Cal. 4th 228 – abandonment does not apply to public works – total cost theory is allowed
    3. Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (2014) 59 Cal. 4th 568 – architect liable in absence of privity
    4. Cates Const., Inc. v. Talbot Partners (1999) 21 Cal.4th 28 – no tort recovery on bonds – performance bonds can cover contract warranties
    5. Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist., 149 Cal. App. 4th 1384 – liability for concealed conditions
    6. Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior Court of Merced County (1976) 17 Cal. 3d 803 – mechanic lien remedy is constitutional
    7. Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg. (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 541indemnity implies obligation to defend [now limited to commercial contracts under CCP 2782 (c)–(h)]
    8. Drennan v. Star Paving Co. (1958) 51 Cal. 2d 409 – subcontractor held liable to contractor for mistaken bid
    9. Erlich v. Menezes (1999) 21 Cal. 4th 543 – limitation on recovery for emotional distress arising from defective work
    10. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing Authority of City of Los Angeles (2007) 152 Cal. App. 4th 720 –contractor’s unpaid invoices are not false claims
    11. Hydrotech Systems v. Oasis Water Park (1991) 52 Cal. 3d 988 – unlicensed contractor may not sue for fraud
    12. J’Aire v. Gregory (1979) 24 Cal. 3d 799 – liability to third parties in absence of privity
    13. Jimenez v. Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal 4th 472- component manufacturers and suppliers held strictly liable
    14. Lantsy v. Centex (2003) 31 Cal. 4th 363 – CCP 337.15 ten year statute of repose not subject to equitable tolling, but is subject to equitable estopple.
    15. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist. v. Great Am. Ins. Co. (2010) 49 Cal. 4th 739 – contractor may recover based upon owner’s concealment of facts
    16. Lusardi Construction Co. v. Aubry (1992) 1 Cal. 4th 976 – contrary to owner’s representation, contractor must pay prevailing wages
    17. McMillen Albany v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 228 – common law claims are subject to statutory prelitigation procedures under Right to Repair Act.
    18. Markborough California, Inc. v Superior Court (1991) 227 Cal. App. 3d 705 enforceability of limitation of liability provisions
    19. M.W. Erectors, Inc. Niederhauser Ornamental (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 412 – contractors barred from recovery for work while not licensed
    20. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass’n. v Pinnacle Market Dev. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 223 – federal arbitration act prevails over CA statutory limitation on arbitration  
    21. Presley Holmes v. American State (2001) 90 Cal App. 4th 571 – duty to defend additional insureds
    22. Privette V. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 – limitation on rights of injured workers to sue owner or general contractor
    23. Scott Co. v. Blount, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal. 4th 1103 – cost shifting – prevailing party
    24. Stearman v. Centex Homes (2000) 781 Cal. 4th 611 – strict liability for damage to caused by a component part – recovery of investigation costs as cost of repairs
    25. Wm. R. Clarke v. Safeco (1997) 15 Cal. 4th 882 – paid if paid clause invalid

    For more information contact:

    Ted Senet, Esq.

    Theodore L. Senet is a partner of the firm. Since joining the firm, Mr. Senet’s areas of practice have been insurance, construction, environmental, and real property law. Mr. Senet has been involved in planning and construction of major projects, including high rise buildings, hospitals, airports, roadways, pipelines, power plants, refineries, and major commercial and residential developments. He currently represents private and public entities in project planning, insurance coverage disputes, complex construction defect and environmental litigation, construction delay claims, and class action litigation.

    The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP (“Gibbs Giden”) for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel.

    For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to the Gibbs Giden website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to The transmission of information by email, over the Gibbs Giden website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this information and the Gibbs Giden website please see the Website Terms section at

    This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm and the attorneys involved.


    Copyright 2022 Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP ©