Skip to Content
  • Priority of Mechanics’ Liens: Bank vs. Contractor

    Black’s Law Dictionary Word of the Month 
    Priority, n.: (1) The status of being earlier in time or higher in degree or rank; precedence. (2) An established right to such precedence; esp., a creditor’s right to have a claim paid before other creditors of the same debtor receive payment.

    Q: How does priority affect my mechanics’ lien on a property when a foreclosure happens?

    A: At the peak of the economic boom, the issue of mechanics’ lien priority on a construction project was hardly a concern. However, as property values continue to decline, priority becomes critical when a property is foreclosed and the money from foreclosure sale is not enough to pay off all the project’s creditors – i.e. bank lenders and contractors. The pertinent question then becomes: who gets paid first? Choice A: the bank lender who recorded a deed of trust on the property, or Choice B: the contractors who properly recorded a lien on the property and timely foreclosed on the project? The answer lies on timing. 

    In Nevada, a mechanics’ lien claimant who properly records a lien and timely forecloses on the property gets to stand in the foreclosure sale distribution line first over any other lien, mortgage or other encumbrance, that was recorded after the commencement of construction. See NRS 108.225. Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP recently won a lien foreclosure case for a general contractor on a priority claim against the bank for a $800,000 mechanic’s lien when it proved that the general contractor had 20 tons of aggregate delivered the day before the bank recorded its deed of trust.

    Thus, a valid mechanics’ lien has priority over any mortgage or deed of trust “which may have attached to the property after the commencement of construction of the work on improvement.” NRS 108.22112 defines “Commencement of construction” to mean any work per-formed, or materials or equipment delivered that is visible from a reasonable inspection of the site. In other words, if lien claimant performs visible, on-site construction before the lender records its deed of trust, then that lien claimant stands first in line in front of the lender on the foreclosure proceeds. 

    Finally, to win on the priority issue, it is not necessary that a lien claim¬ant be the one that actually performed the work. If anyone performed work that would have been “visible from a reasonable inspection of the site,” then all of the mechanic’s lien claimants are entitled to priority ahead of the secured lender. 

    It is important for any mechanics lien claimant who is seeking recovery of amounts due for work performed, to analyze the existence of any other indebtedness and determine the date wherein work was commenced on the project in relation to the date of recordation of any other encumbrance against the property.

    By Becky A. Pintar, Esq. and Airene Haze, Esq.

    Questions or Comments? Contact Us at:
    Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet, LLP
    7450 Arroyo Crossing Parkway, Suite 270
    Las Vegas, NV 89113
    E-mail: bpintar@gglts.com or ahaze@gglts.com 
    Phone: (702) 836-9800

    The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP (“Gibbs Giden”) for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to the Gibbs Giden website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@gibbsgiden.com. The transmission of information by email, over the Gibbs Giden website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this information and the Gibbs Giden website please see the Legal Notices section at /legal-disclaimer. This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm. 
    Copyright 2011 Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP ©